Direct Democracy
Which of the following arguments are more in favor of more direct democracy, and which are more against?
Which arguments are most convincing to you?
Are you for or against the expansion of direct democracy in Japan?
citizens lack professional competence
all state power should come from the people (rulers are also ruled)
higher legitimacy of decisions, if they were made directly by the people
influence (manipulation) of the people by powerful interest groups or demagogues
better participation of citizens in political decisions
citizen decisions can delay processes
special form of control of politicians
stimulation of public debate
minorities and their interests cannot be protected
prevents abuse of power by political representatives
new aspects (innovations) are introduced into the discussion
An assembly of all citizens is not possible in a large country
those affected should decide on measures / decisions themselves
directly affected or well-informed citizens have advantages over uninterested, unaffected or poorly informed ones
can lead to a split in society
high degree of information of the population (good information possibilities by television, newspaper or Internet)
complicated issues can hardly be reduced to yes / no votes
elected bodies and representatives can be damaged or weakened
citizens have their own interests in mind rather than the common good (act selfishly)
necessary but unpopular decisions can be blocked
Interest groups mobilize only for their own purposes
with appropriate quorums, protection against success of minority interests
| in favor of more direct democracy |
against more direct democracy |
|
|